Redistribution and Inequality in a Heterogeneous Society: How Economic Inequality Harms Societies

924917701e19abaf4979_photo__4_.jpg
924917701e19abaf4979_photo__4_.jpg

Presidential aspirants since Ronald Regan have urged us to ask whether we’re better off now than we were four years ago.  At any time from 1945 to the early 1970s the answer for most Americans would have been a resounding yes.  Throughout that period, incomes grew at about 3 percent a year for families up and down the income ladder.  Today, however, this question is more difficult to answer.  During the past several decades, the distributions of income and wealth in the United States have changed in such a way that the economic environment for most upper-middle-class people has become much more lie that of World A than that of World B in our earlier experiences.  For example although the top 1 percent of earners waved more than three times as much purchasing power as in the 1979, the real earnings of families in the middle have risen only slightly since then. The meager income growth that these families have experienced has come not from just one place.

I find that more extensive redistribution tends to lower inequality by benefiting low ability individuals at the expense of high-ability individuals, but to increase inequality by benefiting leisure-loving individuals at the expense of consumption-loving individuals with similar abilities.  More redistribution tends to decrease inequality if redistribution is limited, but to increase inequality if redistribution preferences is not innocent when discussing the effects of redistribution on social inequality.  When redistribution is limited, regenerous redistribution lowers inequality[i] because an individual’s equivalent wage depends primarily on his/her abilities, and because redistribution benefits individuals with low abilities at the expense of individuals with high abilities.  Extensive redistribution, however, makes it impossible for an individual to achieve much higher consumption levels than their average; all individuals thus choose similar bundles consisting of high leisure and relatively low consumption.  Consumption-loving individuals therefore have low equivalent wages while leisure-living individuals have relatively high equivalent wages.  Making a relatively extensive redistribution scheme more extensive then raise inequality, because it harms most the consumption-loving individuals who already have the lowest equivalent wages.

A non-monotonic relationship between redistribution and social welfare is a standard result in literature more and more because measures of social welfare come equity and efficiency considerations.  Social welfare normally decreases in the extent of redistribution if redistribution is so extensive that the economy is on the Laffer curve’s decreasing branch, while equity gains often outweigh efficiency losses when there is little redistribution.  This finding of a non-monotonic relationship between redistribution and social inequality, however, does not directly follow from the efficiency losses associated with extensive redistribution, it is this a stronger and more striking result than a non-monotonic relationship between redistribution and social welfare, and suggests that pure inequality considerations put an upper bound on redistribution when taking the heterogeneity in the individuals’ preferences into account.

Sign Up for E-News

One only has to focus on the lowest equivalent wage if one wants to study social welfare and accept its fairness requirements.  Indeed, their axioms single out particular social preferences like priority of the worst off and a particular measure of individual situations like the equivalent wage.  To focus on social inequality means to change the former but keep the latter.  Even when concerned primarily about social welfare, one might want to know how redistribution affects inequality in equivalent wages.  One reason is that there are possibly multiple redistribution schemes that maximize social welfare, and one might in this want to know how they affect social inequality.  Another reason is that social welfare might depend on inequality in equivalent wages more generally if one of the particular fairness requirements or axioms were modified or dropped even though these requirements seem reasonable to many of us.  The economics of traditional infrastructure is quite complex, as reflected perhaps in the fact that economists sometimes refer to infrastructure opaquely” as social overhead capital.  There are ongoing, hotly contested debates in economic especially about how the costs and benefits of infrastructures, for example, about the degree to which particular infrastructure investments contribute to social welfare or economic growth, and about how to prioritize infrastructure investments in developing countries.  Regardless, most economies recognize that infrastructure resources are important to society precisely because infrastructure resources give rise to large social gains.  The nature of some the gains as spillovers may explain why we take infrastructure for granted.  The externalities are sufficiently difficult to observe or measure quantitatively; much less capture in economic transactions and the benefits may be diffuse and sufficiently small in magnitude to excite the attention of individual beneficiaries.  We should be exploring the relationships these three generalizations.  The accepted role for government associated who infrastructure market failure be related to society’s need for nondiscriminatory community access or to the generation of substantial spillover or to both?  I cannot stress how the society’s need for nondiscriminatory community scaled or generation of substantial spillover or to both becomes the first interest? The societal need for nondiscriminatory community access to infrastructure and the generation of substantial spillovers each appears to independently constitute grounds from identifying a potential market failure and for supporting some role for government.  But the confluence of the two factors suggests that something more complex may be involved.  Might society’s need for nondiscriminatory community access to infrastructure be related to the generation of substantial spillovers?

When individuals differ in their earning abilities and their preferences for consumption and leisure, it is unclear how social inequality should be measured.  Since redistribution bends to benefit low ability and leisure loving individuals at the expense of high ability and consumption loving individuals, it is also unclear how redistribution affects inequality in such a heterogeneous society at least if one is not willing to assume that redistribution from consumption loving to leisure loving individuals with similar abilities reduces inequality.  Approaches based on inequality in consumption, and leisure are achieved in utility levels and unsuitable for measuring inequality in a heterogeneous society, and hence also for analyzing how redistribution effects social inequality. 

In principle then, social inequality measures could be based n the inequality in achieved utilities levels; however, any such measure requires interpersonal utility comparisons.  Such comparisons are fine if all individuals have identical preferences such that they all reach the same conclusions when comparing utilities interpersonally, However, they are not fine if preferences are heterogeneous, different individuals do in general reach different conclusion.  The inequality in such a heterogeneous society therefore cannot be meaningfully evaluated with measures of the inequality in achieved utilities levels.


[i] As an example, the popular public finance textbooks of Rosen (2005) and Stiglitz (2000) assume that individuals differ in their incomes only when discussing inequality.  Following Mirrlees (1971). The assumption that individuals differ only in their earning abilities has become standard in the economic literature on taxation and redistribution.

 

 The Guest Column is our readers' opportunity to write about a given issue or topic in an in-depth and educational manner.

The opinions expressed herein are the writer's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of TAPinto.net or anyone who works for TAPinto.net. TAPinto.net is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the writer.

TAP Into Another Town's News:

You May Also Be Interested In

Sign Up for E-News

Berkeley Heights

'Tired of cronyism? Yeah, us too'

July 21, 2018

The Union County Freeholders’ decision to appoint State Senator and newly-elected Union County Democratic Chairman, Nick Scutari’s chief of staff, Ed Oatman as County Manager smelled of corruption from the start. To place a political consultant like Oatman in the role of overseeing 2,800 employees and running the day-to-day operations of the $500 million county budget suggests ...

TAPinto Spotlight on Business Features New Providence Dentistry

July 17, 2018

NEW PROVIDENCE, NJ - TAPinto "Summer Spotlight on Business" features local businesses and their owners who are important to our communities. Follow this column to receive a fresh perspective on small business owners and their unique needs while shining a spotlight on their stories.

This edition features New Providence Dentistry, operated by Dr. Beth Herko and her staff of ...

Avoiding 10% Tax Penalty

Do you want access to money from your retirement accounts but aren't sure of the real costs involved?

Most retirement accounts have a set age requirement you must reach before making penalty-free income distributions, which is usually 59.5 but can sometimes be as early as age 50. If you decide to access your accounts earlier, you could face penalties ranging from 10%-25%, which is not ...

Caring Contact Volunteer Listener Training

July 21, 2018

Caring Contact Volunteer Listener Training Fall 2018

Are you looking for a flexible, rewarding volunteer opportunity?

Have you ever been told you are a good listener?

Do you have a yearning to really make a difference?

Become a Caring and Crisis Hotline Listener.

You could save a life.

Volunteers receive 52 hours of comprehensive training in active listening, Mental Health ...

Shakespeare in the Park Returns to Union County Sunday, July 22

The Union County Board of Chosen Freeholders is pleased to announce the return of Shakespeare in the Park this weekend. The performance will be presented on Sunday, July 22 at 12:30 p.m. at Cedar Brook Park in Plainfield.

The Shrew Mechanicals Troupe from The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey will present an hour long performance of “Shakespeare Gumbo,” a stirring collection of ...

Enjoy a Lifetime of Discovery in Union County Parks

July is National Parks and Recreation Month, and Union County residents are invited to celebrate this year by exploring “undiscovered” programs and activities found throughout the nearly 6,200 acres of the Union County parks system.

“Union County was one of the very first counties in the United States to establish its own county-based park system for nature conservation and ...

Union County Honored for History Projects

ELIZABETH, NJ - The Union County Board of Chosen Freeholders is pleased to announce that two national achievement recognitions for history projects have been presented to the Union County Office of Cultural & Heritage Affairs, a division of the Department of Parks and Recreation.

“Union County is rich in history, and this Freeholder Board is committed to engaging the public with ...

Geoffrey the Giraffe Moves In To New Brunswick Children's Hospital

July 12, 2018

NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ - Over a stretch of nearly 70 years, Geoffrey the Giraffe at Toys R Us stores was the symbol of happy times for generations of children, and now he may provide those same feelings for children coming to a hospital.

"From this day forward, Geoffrey stands tall in our lobby to encourage our smallest patients to smile when they enter our facilities," said John ...

Upcoming Events

Sun, July 22, 2:00 PM

Scherman Hoffman Wildlife Sanctuary, Bernardsville

NJ Audubon: Moths and other Pollinators

Education Green

Carousel_image_634bcda860ed17650f72_93a8625c-ce9d-413f-a61e-4b2df4fe0604

Tue, July 24, 3:00 PM

Grillestone Restaurant , Scotch Plains

Hear the Story of Amelia Earhart, America's Most ...

Arts & Entertainment Food & Drink

Carousel_image_e6c7d5b8a558926ee4c5_8e2f7c3f3d7547130a87_swim_team_2

Tue, July 24, 5:30 PM

Summit YMCA, Summit

Summit Area YMCA Swim Team Tryouts July 24th

Health & Wellness

Carousel_image_e6c7d5b8a558926ee4c5_8e2f7c3f3d7547130a87_swim_team_2

Tue, July 24, 5:30 PM

Summit YMCA, Summit

Summit Area YMCA Swim Team Tryouts July 24th

Health & Wellness

Carousel_image_b91f21bd7ac6c164e408_wednesday_matinees_at_trailside

Wed, July 25, 1:30 PM

Trailside Nature & Science Center, MountainsidE

Trailside’s Annual Summer Wednesday Matinee ...

Arts & Entertainment Education

Wed, July 25, 7:30 PM

Chatham United Methodist Church, Chatham

Masterwork’s Summer Sings Conclude with Verdi ...

Arts & Entertainment

Special June Episode of 'Berkeley Heights Here & Now' Features 6th Annual Street Fair

BERKELEY HEIGHTS, NJ – The Berkeley Heights Communications Committee (BHCC) today announced a special edition of Berkeley Heights Here & Now is available on the Township website, www.berkeleyheightstwpnj.gov.

 

The special episode features the 6th Annual Berkeley Heights Street Fair held on June 24 and includes onsite interviews with attending residents/visitors, event ...

And Over Here is the Dining Hall 2

My very first job in admissions was while I was still an undergraduate myself as a tour guide.  Very early on they indoctrinated us with some tricks of the trade.  It’s a dining hall, not a cafeteria.  A residence hall, not a dorm.  If you have to divulge some negative bit of information, sandwich it between two positives.  There were instructions for glossing over ...

Women Have Special Financial Needs That Advisors Overlook

Women have special financial needs that advisors overlook in two ways: 1) advisors don’t always acknowledge the different planning needs women have and 2) advisors don’t always communicate well with female clients – especially if the client comes to a meeting with her husband. It’s very common for a male advisor to spend much or most of the face time in meetings talking to ...

5 Simple Ways to Save Water this Summer

According to the L.A. Times, the average American uses an estimated 98 gallons of water EACH day.  

Here are five simple ways you can save water, to help you conserve water this summer and take some pressure off of your drains.

1. Unless you are using it, turn the faucet off. How many of us still leave the water running while we shave or brush our teeth?According to ...