Letters to the Editor

Response to Routh Letter on School Referendum

Dear Editor:
On March 26 Alan Routh responded to a letter to the editor I wrote (also dated March 26). Rather than address the points I raised, he instead chose to discredit my opinions by labelling them as a “disservice.”
Mr. Routh would have done a better service to the public to address the valid problems identified with the bundled referendum rather than play to emotions by asserting that a volunteer board of education could never propose something less than prudent, because after all, they are volunteers. 
I like many others are thankful to the Board for the time they commit to an unpaid task, and respect them for stepping up. I myself have volunteered countless hours over more than a decade at both municipal and civic pursuits, so I understand the sacrifice the Board members make.

But to declare that the public should not question a referendum that has shortcomings, developed without community input until it was already unveiled, because by doing so we are somehow questioning the dedication of the Board is sheer nonsense. Indeed, it appears to be a strategy designed to deflect attention away from the flawed referendum itself. 
So as to the points made in my letter, I offer the following “clarification”:
 There is no confusion as to how a referendum interfaces with an operating budget.  Money borrowed has to be repaid. The debt service (or mortgage payment in Mr. Routh’s analogy) is paid mainly from an appropriation of property tax revenues. They are not repaid with fairy dust; they are repaid with property tax revenues approved each year by the voters.
So if one believes, as I do, that the PAC and the administrative offices are unnecessary, then the Operating Budget is unduly burdened with debt service costs related to those specific projects. Not having to pay these costs would allow voters the choice of redirecting the funds (through operating budget or second question approvals) to other educational priorities. On the other hand, raising taxes to pay debt service on unnecessary projects means taxes will need to rise even more to fund desired educational programs down the road.
In this regard the PAC does indeed constrain future program funding flexibility by using scarce tax revenues to pay for unnecessary projects. 
 The Board made it clear in public comments that bundling the various questions (many of which have merit), would enhance chances of passage of a referendum containing an increasingly unpopular Performing Arts Center. So in that sense the referendum certainly is a grab bag of 
good and bad projects meant to appeal to a sufficient number of vested interests to ensure passage. That’s not how strategic capital planning is supposed to be done.
 Mr. Routh makes the claim that “No referendum, no FDK.” That is patently false. Should the current referendum fail, the Board will have the ability to float another bond referendum in the near future to address additional classroom space for FDK and other meritorious projects separately without bundling them with a new PAC and administrative offices. The public does NOT need to approve THIS referendum to expand the elementary schools to allow for FDK, rehabilitate Cougar Field, or address other capital needs that a strategic plan would identify.
 The benefits of relocating district offices, according to Mr. Routh, are “hard to quantify.” I rest 
my case. If they are hard to quantify than why are they being considered? Only projects with quantifiable benefits should be included in the Referendum.
The debate that is unfolding in our community surrounding the April 21 bond referendum is a good, healthy thing. It is refreshing and frankly overdue in a community where only 12-15 percent of registered voters typically show up to approve school budgets each April. While some obviously see any questioning of the Board as somehow disloyal or offensive, open debate is the hallmark of American society. It is unfortunate that those who favor the rubber stamping of all Board decisions are trying to label residents opposed to the referendum as somehow doing a “disservice” to the Board, the School District, or the broader Chatham community.  
Peter Hoffman
Chatham Borough

The opinions expressed herein are the writer's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of TAPinto.net or anyone who works for TAPinto.net. TAPinto.net is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the writer. Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor.

TAP Into Another Town's News:

You May Also Be Interested In

Sign Up for E-News


A Week at the Library of The Chathams Monday, February 19 – Sunday, February 25, 2018


By Galina Natenzon

Friends of the Library are continuing their book collection in preparation for Annual Book Sale.  Kids are off from school on Monday for Presidents’ Day – bring them to the library!  We have plenty for them to do.  For adults, Professor Licklider’s second lecture on North Korea will take place on Tuesday.  The ...

A Week at the Library of The Chathams - Monday, February 5 – Sunday, Sunday, February 11, 2018

A Week at the Library of The Chathams

Monday, February 5 – Sunday, Sunday, February 11, 2018


By Galina Natenzon

Friends of the Library book collection continues.  The tax season is here, and dedicated volunteers are here to help you with you tax returns!

For information about all programs or to sign up, please call the library at 973‑635‑0603 or go to ...

Imagine a Chatham Toboggan Ride from the Top of Fairmount Avenue to Main Street

Did you know….
there was a time when Chatham kids could ice skate from downtown Chatham all the way to Florham Park? And that a toboggan ride could last from the top of Fairmount Avenue down to Main Street and beyond?

Those were the days!

This was back in the early to mid-1900s. The Passaic River meandered through grassy meadows and woods on the north side of Chatham. The marshy ...


February 20, 2018

To the Editor,

I told my daughter I needed to write about gun violence. Know what she told me? “Mom, be sure you’re not too polarizing. People won’t listen.” She’s right. At age eleven she’s figured out that we adults need to be reminded how to speak to one another in order to fix a problem. But I have hope and belief that we can fix that discourse in our ...


AtlantiCast: Episode 12

On this week’s episode of AtlantiCast, decade of excellence makes headlines, as Atlantic Health’s place on Fortune Magazine’s 100 Best Companies to Work For List leads off the newest episode of AtlantiCast. Also on this week’s show, check out the newest “hybrid” operating room at Morristown Medical Center and find out how Atlantic Health is helping local ...

AtlantiCast Medical Minute: Atlantic Orthopedic Institute’s Scoliosis and Spinal Deformity Center

On this episode of the AtlantiCast Medical Minute, we’ll take you inside the Atlantic Orthopedic Institute’s Scoliosis and Spinal Deformity Center, with the center’s director, Jason Lowenstein, MD.

Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1M7euCp86-c

AtlantiCast Episode 011

Breaking Atlantic Health System news on this week’s AtlantiCast! Plus, find out why Morristown Medical Center is one of the best hospitals in the nation when it comes to recovering from joint surgery, see the newest center for fighting brain cancer and an Atlantic Health System red-carpet premiere!


Mindfulness and Meditation Courses Beginning March 2018

February 20, 2018

Mindfulness and Meditation Courses Beginning March 2018

-Space is limited as classes will be small-

MADISON, NJ – In celebration of the new spring season, come experience and enjoy Mindfulness and Meditation with Wendi L. Dumbroff, MA, LPC. Dumbroff is a Licensed Professional Counselor in private practice in Madison, New Jersey, where she specializes in individual, family, ...