Letters to the Editor

Funding Pensions: Spending Cuts, Not Another Penny From Taxpayers

60c121f808fb4cba11fd_94b2f018aa894003d97c_2d17f420effdc16f8c0f_100_6490.JPG
Donna M. Simon Credits: courtesy photo
60c121f808fb4cba11fd_94b2f018aa894003d97c_2d17f420effdc16f8c0f_100_6490.JPG

To the editor:

It’s only fair that the State of New Jersey keep its promises to tens of thousands of retirees regarding their pension payments.

So it was no surprise when the respected Monmouth University Polling Institute recently conducted a survey that found more than 70 percent of New Jersey voters would support a proposed constitutional amendment, advanced by Trenton Democrats, that would force the state to contribute to the public pension fund.

Sign Up for E-News

The problem is that the Democrats intentionally decided to hide key facts from taxpayers regarding their pension amendment and were quite literally trying to trick voters into supporting their amendment on the ballot.

Monmouth University Polling Director Patrick Murray said it best: “New Jersey voters support the principle of meeting our obligation to public employees, but it is not at all clear they understand how this Constitutional amendment would ‘tie Trenton’s hands’ and they won’t understand it when they walk into the voting booth, since the wording of the proposed ballot questions and interpretive statement says nothing about these probable trade-offs.

The trade-offs that Mr. Murray references – and that the Democrats willfully refused to disclose – are that mandating pension payments through the Constitution means pensions for public employees would take precedence over all other types of state spending – including: K-12 schools, roads/bridges, programs for seniors, veterans and the poor. Every one of those programs would be forfeited to pay the pension.

To put it another way, the special interests who control the Democrats legislative agenda want to constitutionally mandate that public employee pensions is the most important line item in our state budget.

More important than children’s education.

More important than the roads and bridges we travel on.

More important than programs to help seniors, veterans and the poor.

It is no surprise that when voters learn the whole truth, their opinion shifts dramatically away from their original widespread support.

In fact, the Monmouth University poll showed that when the facts are fully presented only 25 percent of voters would make the full pension payments while 63 percent would rather fund the schools.

Twenty-eight percent would make the full pension payments while 58 percent would rather fund services for the poor.

Thirty percent would make the full pension payments while 59 percent would rather fund roads and bridges.

The Democrats will no doubt try to claim that the pension amendment won’t impact other services.

However, the reality is that the only alternative to slashing valued programs and services would be a substantial increase in the sales tax and/or increase in our income tax.

Even the Supreme Court saw this coming, which is why it ruled that forcing the full pension payments would strangle the rest of our state’s finances.

The bottom line is this: We have no more to give and neither will our children.

By bankrolling the Trenton Democrats' legislative campaigns, the special interest power brokers have vast amounts of control over the Democratic agenda in Trenton and are assured of getting whatever they want regardless of the negative consequences to taxpayers.

Their proposed constitutional amendment is terrible public policy, but unfortunately political power is more important to them than doing what’s right.

I urge everyone reading this to follow the money rather than letting Trenton take more of yours.

Donna M. Simon is a former state assemblywoman representing the 16th Legislative District including towns in Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex and Somerset counties.

The opinions expressed herein are the writer's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of TAPinto.net or anyone who works for TAPinto.net. TAPinto.net is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the writer. Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor.

TAP Into Another Town's News:

You May Also Be Interested In

Sign Up for E-News

Flemington/Raritan

Malinowski Supports NJ Infrastructure

July 11, 2018

To the editor,

I support Tom Malinowski in the election to represent New Jersey’s 7th district this November because he will support infrastructure investments that are essential to the continued prosperity of this district.

Tom recognizes this district’s dire need for infrastructure appropriations, and he knows how essential the Gateway Project is for not only those who commute ...

Upcoming Events

Mon, July 16, 9:00 AM

Flemington Public Library, Flemington

Coding Camp at Mediatech

Education

Tue, July 17, 9:00 AM

Flemington Public Library, Flemington

Coding Camp at Mediatech

Education

Carousel_image_74a12190ac13ddcce315_thumbnail_photo_head_shot

Tue, July 17, 12:00 PM

Al Fresco's Restaurant, Flemington

Small Biz Networking Meetup July 17 at Al Fresco's

Business & Finance

Malinowski Supports NJ Infrastructure

July 11, 2018

To the editor,

I support Tom Malinowski in the election to represent New Jersey’s 7th district this November because he will support infrastructure investments that are essential to the continued prosperity of this district.

Tom recognizes this district’s dire need for infrastructure appropriations, and he knows how essential the Gateway Project is for not only those who commute ...

Notice of Hearing, Raritan Township

July 16, 2018

A public hearing will be held before the Raritan Township Zoning Board of Adjustment at the Municipal Building, located at 1 Municipal Drive in the  Committee/Court Meeting Room on Thursday July 19 at 7:30 p.m. on the following application: The above applicant is requesting approval of and any and all variances and waivers as may be required by the Board for an 28.56 kw Ground Mounted P.V.