Letters to the Editor

Doherty: Pay Equity Debate Is About Remedies, Not Merits

e7f99ece9f2aab9ecbe7_doherty-senate.jpg
Sen. Michael J. Doherty (R-23) speaking on the floor of the New Jersey Senate. Credits: courtesy photo
e7f99ece9f2aab9ecbe7_doherty-senate.jpg

To the editor:

Everyone agrees that women deserve equal pay for equal work. Thankfully, both state and federal law already prohibit wage discrimination on the basis of an employee’s gender, as they rightly should.

Those prohibitions are explicit in the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay Act of 1963, as well as in New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination.

Sign Up for E-News

Further, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act signed by former President Barack Obama in 2009 set the modern standard for how to address pay inequities experienced by women.

In a recent case, Alexander v. Seton Hall University, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a ruling that effectively aligned how the state’s courts would handle gender-based wage discrimination cases going forward with the standards set forth in the Ledbetter Act.

I believe that it makes sense to codify that alignment in the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, which would provide clarity to women who want to know how pay discrimination cases will be remedied in this state.

Instead, we have been presented with legislation (S-992) that goes far beyond what the federal government and other states have found to be a reasonable framework for correcting discriminatory pay inequities.

To his credit, Gov. Chris Christie clearly and concisely expressed many of the serious problems with this legislation in his conditional veto of the bill.

My many criticisms of the governor during his tenure have been widely reported. I have been perhaps the most vocal Republican opposition to many of his proposals and actions over the years. On this, however, he is right on the money.

By offering a conditional veto, it is clear that the governor sees room for improving current law, as do Senate Republicans.

Instead of working with us to improve a flawed bill, Senate Democrats tried, and failed, to override the governor’s conditional veto of the legislation.

To be clear, this debate is not on the merits of pay equity. This is a debate on what constitutes a reasonable remedy to address instances of discrimination and, hopefully, to deter future violations of acts that are already illegal.

With regards to S-992, my concerns lie with specific provisions of the bill that would set New Jersey as an outlier among the states.

Specifically, the legislation would create a new burden of proof for employers, provide for an unlimited recovery period, and impose a burdensome salary reporting requirement.

S-992 would change how the burden of proof operates in these cases, essentially putting employers in the position of having to prove their practices were not discriminatory, akin to being guilty until proven innocent.

With regards to recovery, the Ledbetter Act limits the period of employment on which damages may be collected for pay discrimination to two years, which we believe is reasonable. Under this bill, there would be no such limit.

The combination of a new burden of proof standard and an unlimited recovery period may require employers to produce evidence from decades ago to show that a payroll was based on legitimate practices, such as a seniority system. Many of those records may not exist today.

Additionally, this proposal would require any business that does work with the state to submit reports on an ongoing basis detailing the demographics and pay of employees.

That additional red tape would dissuade businesses, both small and large, from bidding on state contracts. The likely result would be less competition, resulting in higher costs to taxpayers.

Quite simply, the expensive and unworkable scheme that would be imposed by this legislation is designed to benefit trial lawyers first and foremost, with women, jobs and taxpayers as an afterthought.

Our Republican caucus has worked for months with the sponsor to develop a solution that is focused on women, not attorneys. Unfortunately, the other side wasn’t willing to be reasonable as they have in the past on a number of important issues.

If the sponsor is willing to work with us, we can achieve our shared goals of preventing future pay discrimination and providing clear remedies to women who have been wronged.

We can do this without the undesired consequences that the currently proposed legislation surely would invite.


Michael J. Doherty
Senator - 23rd Legislative District

The opinions expressed herein are the writer's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of TAPinto.net or anyone who works for TAPinto.net. TAPinto.net is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the writer. Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor.

TAP Into Another Town's News:

You May Also Be Interested In

Sign Up for E-News

Flemington/Raritan

Trump Border Policy Wrong, Counterproductive

June 20, 2018

To the editor:

As an educator and a child-advocate, I have been at the forefront of the immigration debate over the past decade. And while I have always advocated for a comprehensive solution, I never thought any opposing plans were morally wrong; until now!

The Trump policy of separating children from their parents at the border is morally wrong and counter-productive from a public ...

A Man of 'Deep Pockets, Sterling Character'

To the editor:

At a meeting of Flemington Borough Council earlier this year, Mayor Phil Greiner described Jack Cust as a man of “deep pockets and sterling character.” He seemed to be attempting to justify his basis for selecting a new redeveloper, after the first two selected by a committee he was part of, or led, failed at the project. Initially the project was to find someone to ...

End 'Gun Free Zones,' Harden Soft Targets

To the editor:

In response to the Governor's recent signing of legislation restricting law-abiding gun owners to 10 rounds of ammunition and rejecting calls to address the uneven playing field existing vis-à-vis some single mom alone with her child fending for herself against some armed assailant packing who knows how many rounds is something a Politburo thug would appreciate! The ...

Voter Turnout in Raritan Township

To the editor,

We want to share our admiration for all of the Raritan Township residents who came out to vote in the June 5 Primary Election. Additionally, we want to say "thank you" to our Democratic supporters for their votes.

As we look to the General Election on Nov. 6, we reflect on the importance of this election for our children, seniors and all those in between as we ...

Alzheimer's is Public Health Crisis

To the editor:

 

With more than 5 million Americans now living with Alzheimer’s and with more than 15 million acting as caregivers, Alzheimer’s has become the nation’s most expensive disease. This year alone, it will cost $277 billion to take care of those stricken. The Alzheimer’s Association predicts that, by 2050, more than 14 million Americans will be ...

Candidates 'Weaponized' News Article

To the editor:

I was dismayed to see my 2014 news reportage inaccurately weaponized by council members Marc Hain and Brooke Warden in their campaign flier attacking Al Brewer. The headline “School security at issue: Flemington-Raritan board member accused of leaking secrets” is less than a half-truth, given the ensuing revelation.

Marc and Brook ignored my follow-up report in ...

Upcoming Events

Mon, June 25, 9:00 AM

Flemington Public Library, Flemington

Coding Camp at Mediatech

Education

Tue, June 26, 9:00 AM

Flemington Public Library, Flemington

Coding Camp at Mediatech

Education

Trump Border Policy Wrong, Counterproductive

June 20, 2018

To the editor:

As an educator and a child-advocate, I have been at the forefront of the immigration debate over the past decade. And while I have always advocated for a comprehensive solution, I never thought any opposing plans were morally wrong; until now!

The Trump policy of separating children from their parents at the border is morally wrong and counter-productive from a public ...

Driver, Runion, Giles-McCormick, Kick-Off Campaign

June 19, 2018

FLEMINGTON, NJ — Borough Mayor candidate Betsy Driver and Borough Council candidates Chris Runion and Caitlin Giles-McCormick have joined their campaigns in advance of the Nov. 6, 2018 election.

Since winning her campaign to become a Borough Councilperson, Betsy Driver has already passed resolutions to get Council meetings streamed live and videotaped for later viewing; a tuition credit ...