The Tyranny of the Judiciary

Here is the law of the land since the 1950s. It was written by Congress and signed by President Eisenhower. It reads as follows: “Suspension of Entry or Imposition of Restrictions by President:  Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

Quite simply, with no ambiguity, the president of the United States, according to United States law, and reaffirmed as late as 2013 by the Supreme Court, has sole and total power over who does and who does not get into this country for as long as he may deem necessary when such entry would be judged by him to be detrimental to the interests of the United States. That is the law!

I can hear you asking yourselves, “Why would Congress give the president this much power over immigrant and refugee entry to the country?” Here is where I earn my paycheck. A history lesson: It starts with a Supreme Court decision in 1948, Chicago & Southern Airlines v. Waterman, and Justice Robert Jackson (source: a column by Andy McCarthy of the National Review).

Sign Up for E-News

Who was he? He was Roosevelt’s former attorney general, and he was the chief prosecutor at Nuremberg. Justice Robert Jackson explained in this Supreme Court case that “decisions involving foreign policy, including alien threats to national security, are political, not judicial in nature.” Continuing, “Thus, they are wholly confided by our Constitution to the political departments of the government, executive and legislative. They are delicate, complex and involve large elements of prophecy. They are and should be undertaken only by those directly responsible to the people whose welfare they advance or imperil.”

Justice Jackson continued: “They are decisions of a kind for which the judiciary has neither aptitude, facilities nor responsibility, and have long been held to belong in the domain of political power, not subject to judicial intrusion or inquiry.”

What he was saying, again without ambiguity, is that the judiciary is not equipped, prepared, structured, or competent to determine national security questions. Why, you may ask? The biggest reason is they do not get intelligence briefings. There is no daily brief for the Supreme Court. Like us, all they know is what they read or see or hear in the news. So after that ruling, Congress wrote the 1952 law: They took the Supreme Court ruling and codified it and made it statute law.

So what we now have here is a judge in Seattle and three judges at the 9th Circuit who went looking for precedent, for legal backing, The United States Supreme Court—and because of a ruling that is still active today, backed up by a 1952 statute—did what the law says they cannot do. Which is why, if you’ve read any of their rulings, they do not rule on the law. They ruled on their beliefs. They legislated.

For all the talk from talking heads and the likes of Sen. McCain about Trump beginning to act like a tyrant, the real tyranny is coming from a judge in Seattle and the 9th Circuit. When one looks at the legal history of this whole concept, if there is a tyranny going on here, if there is anybody operating outside the law, it is a judge in Seattle and the 9th Circuit.

Whatever Trump said as a candidate, whatever Trump said as a nominee was not relevant. It did not matter. The judges had no jurisdiction to rule on this matter. They should have tossed this out, saying the states had no standing. What the Democrats and the judges are counting on is that you, the citizen, are too lazy to know what the actual law says and the history behind it. Except, now you know.

This is what I say. What say you?

The opinions expressed herein are the writer's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of or anyone who works for is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the writer.

TAP Into Another Town's News:

You May Also Be Interested In

Sign Up for E-News


Here's What You Missed Last Week

Last week, the Daily News ran a headline, “When is our father coming home?” This dealt with a person here illegally, married to an American woman with a family, who was arrested at an Army base while delivering pizza. You are supposed to think that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), under Trump, is tearing families apart. As usual, it was a crock of cow pies. It was ...

Watergate Analogies Apply to Obama, Not Trump

My liberal counterpart in this publication is about my age. Maybe I am the baby of the group, but we all have had the same seminal experiences of our youth: Vietnam, the civil rights movement and Watergate. These are what shaped our political perspectives.

Looking back, maybe, just maybe those who thought Nixon was really deserving of his fate cannot be faulted for thinking so. It was once ...

Reagan on Trump

The party of “Honest Abe” has now become the party of Dishonest Don, and what follows are some disturbing displays of a Republican Party that has become devoid of conscience:

• More than 4,600 American citizens dead in Puerto Rico—a postscript to the government’s abysmal response to the widespread devastation of Hurricane Maria; 
• The underhanded ...

The Rich Get Richer, and We’re Paying For It

According to a Harvard University study published late last year, most Americans believe that the richest 20 percent of Americans own just half of the nation’s wealth. Wrong! The top 20 percent own 93 percent of the nation’s wealth, and the top 1 percent own 40 percent of that wealth. Additionally, the top 10 percent of earners in 2017 took home more than half the nation’s ...

Competing—Against Yourself

This is the time of year when students are recognized at public ceremonies for notable achievements in their studies, their sports and in their extracurricular pursuits.

Where we live, there are awards in various sports that are named for our son, who also is memorialized by town ballfield Harrison Apar Field of Dreams and a charitable foundation of the same name.

Due to a rare dwarfism, ...

Honoring Our Veterans’ Freedom of Speech

Memorial Day is over, but writing about America’s veterans doesn’t have an expiration date.

My dad, George, was as proud a veteran as you’d meet. He served in the Army in World War II and loved our country no less than the next veteran. I am proud of him, as is my brother, Robert, who served in the Air Force.

Growing up, the one vacation we took each year was spent with ...

I Come from the Land Down Under

I know this is a family column, so I’m going to put this in as delicate terms as possible.

This morning I woke up and I knew, as sure as the sun shines over Bora Bora, that something was very, very wrong in that place in my body where the Bora Bora sun doesn’t shine.

It’s that place I used to refer to my daughter as her hoo-hoo. But it certainly wasn’t a happy ...

Mouthing Off

When I went for oral surgery last spring, the doctor told me he could only do one half of my mouth that day or I wouldn’t be able to eat for two weeks. Considering it was almost bathing suit season, I didn’t think that was necessarily a bad thing. But he convinced me otherwise, and told me if I was really gung ho about getting it all done, I could come back in a month or so to have ...

Upcoming Events


Wed, June 27, 9:00 AM

Putnam County Department of Health, Brewster

PCDOH Free HIV Testing Day

Health & Wellness

Facebook Provides Verification Badges for All TAPinto Facebook Pages

June 4, 2018

TAPinto and its 75 partner sites have been verified on Facebook with the social media platform's blue badge, which is given to news organizations that meet Facebook's authenticity criteria. 

Facebook gives the blue verification badge to "eligible brands, media organizations and public figures," based on factors that include policy compliance and public ...