Rutgers University

Men Heard More this Presidential Election, RU Says

NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ - Since women make up more than half of the population, comprise 53 percent of the electorate, and for the first time in history a woman is at the top of a major political party’s presidential ticket, you might think that the female political perspective would be a large part of this season’s nonstop cable news coverage.

But you’d be wrong. Men outnumber women significantly in cable news political punditry, according to research being conducted by The Eagleton Institute’s Center for American Women in Politics at Rutgers. The center is working with Gender Avenger, an advocacy website that encourages people to identify areas where women have been left out.

“At this point, there is no excuse for not including women, but it’s happening,” said CAWP Director Debbie Walsh. ”We have heard this too many times. They want women but they just can’t find them.  It doesn’t hold up.”

Sign Up for E-News

CAWP is leading Gender Avenger’s “Who Talks?” research initiative and providing a weekly tally and analysis of the gender balance on the top-rated morning and nightly cable news shows – Morning Joe (MSNBC), Fox and Friends (FOX), New Day (CNN), Rachel Maddow (MSNBC), The Kelly File (FOX) and Anderson Cooper 360 (CNN). Gender Avenger’s other partner on the project is the Women’s Media Center, a non-profit progressive women's media organization founded by well-known feminists including Jane Fonda and Gloria Steinem.

The Rutgers CAWP research study began in March and will continue until a week after the presidential election on Tuesday, November 8.  After that, the information will be analyzed to determine how often the bookers, producers and hosts on cable news shows are seeking the female perspective.

Overall, it doesn’t look too promising, according to CAWP’s research. While Anderson Cooper on CNN and Rachel Maddow on MSNBC have broken the 50 percent mark when it comes to featuring female pundits, the rest are well below with FOX News Network’s The Kelly File and Fox and Friends scoring the lowest with only 15 percent of women panelists for The Kelly File and 19 percent for Fox and Friends.

“Many people watch the news without focusing on who is providing the analysis,” said Walsh.  “But when they are confronted with the numbers I think they will realize that there is a serious disparity and hopefully will take action.”

Chelsea Hill, a research assistant at CAWP, spends six hours each day tracking the gender of the political pundits on these cable news shows by tuning in, listening to podcasts or reading transcripts.

“With all this information, I’d be really good at a cocktail party or really bad, depending on your perspective,” said Hill, a 26-year-old millennial who took on the job after receiving her graduate degree in women and gender studies from the Graduate School at Rutgers-New Brunswick.

In collecting the data, Hill does not look at the content of what the men and women on the panels are saying but rather at how many women are actually included on the panels, in how many segments and for how long.  Researchers are only interested in segments that revolve around the presidential election. Anything else being discussed gets fast forwarded, Hill said.

Gina Glantz, co-founder of Gender Avenger and campaign manager for former Sen. Bill Bradley’s presidential run in 2000, wants to bring attention to the times when women are excluded or underrepresented. And not just on cable television.

Her mission to create an online advocacy organization was spawned in 2012 when Harvard University Kennedy School’s post-election forum featured all white men. “It was a stunning omission especially four years after Americans elected the first black president and four years after Hillary Clinton spoke about making cracks in the glass ceiling,” Glantz said.

Gender Avenger has launched efforts to expose gender imbalance including at conferences, in “top” lists and at cultural events. When Esquire magazine’s list of “The 80 Books Every Man Should Read,” included only one female author, the community responded through social media and the publication responded by publishing a balanced list of “Books Everyone Should Read”.

Before the 2016 primary season Glantz noticed that more often than not it was all male panels discussing issues affecting women. “They were dismissive of Trump’s misogynistic comments and consumed with whether Hillary Clinton did enough smiling,” Glantz said.  “I knew in order to change the make-up of analysts – and the conversations on cable – I needed facts, not just impressions.”

"This is why Gender Avenger thought it was so important to partner with CAWP to get real data from scientific research that could be taken to the networks, she said. “Whether it is Trump or Clinton, this presidency and his or her administration need to be seen through the eyes of women who represent 50 percent of the population and, as important, 53 percent of the electorate.”

TAP Into Another Town's News:

You May Also Like

Sign Up for E-News

New Brunswick

The Jaffe Briefing - September 20, 2017


TRENTON - In all the fluff of a political season - when all candidates promise to save the world in exchange for your precious vote - there's one issue that needs addressing: the F grade that our state finances have received from Truth in Accounting - a think tank that analyzes government financial reporting. Of no surprise, the think tank ...

Upcoming Events


Sat, September 23, 2:00 PM

The Metlar-Bodine House Museum, Piscataway

The Wreck of The Broker: The Story of New ...

Arts & Entertainment Education

Sat, September 30, 11:00 AM

East Brunswick Elks, East Brunswick

ParaX Paranormal Expo

Arts & Entertainment

What's New at Rutgers This Year? For Starters, College Avenue

September 6, 2017

NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ — If you've recently walked College Avenue, you know just how different it looks.

But Rutgers University's upgrades didn't end there. In fact, from a renovated football practice complex to revamped food options, quite a bit has changed on the banks since the spring semester finished.

“This past year has been especially rewarding because we've ...

Rutgers President Criticizes Trump's Move to End DACA

NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ — Rutgers University's president strongly rebuked President Donald Trump's decision today to end an executive order protecting young undocumented immigrants from deportation.

Robert Barchi, Rutgers' president, sent a letter to the university community in defense of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, commonly known as DACA, and what it does ...

Get Ready for Sunday's Annual Rubber Duck Race

September 22, 2017

NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ - The 2017 Raritan River Festival and Rubber Duck Race is coming to town this Sunday, Sept. 24, noon to 6 p.m. at Boyd Park, on the riverside of Route 18 and Commercial Avenue in New Brunswick.

Admission is free and parking is available at the Rutgers University Public Safety Parking Deck.

Now in its 38th year, the festival first came to light in 1980, in celebration ...

State Infant/Child Car Seat Rules Currently in Effect

September 13, 2017

TRENTON, NJ - Effective September 1, 2015, legislation set in place revised parameters relative to the use of infant / child car seats in the Garden State. New Jersey guidelines currently mandate the following:

Newborn to Age 2

Children under age 2 and under 30 lbs. must be in a rear-facing car seat with a five-point harness. Toddlers who are tall or have long legs ...


Should New Brunswick Become the New State Capital?

September 21, 2017

Dear TAPInto New Brunswick,

 I'm a thinker-and hopefully not an idealist as much as a pragmatist.  Growing up I thought I wanted to be an engineer, but only later did I realize I was mainly preoccupied in the learning of the concepts, physics, more than the application, engineering, of the craft.  It was not because I did not want to apply what I learned in the classroom in ...

LD17 Assembly Candidate Robert Quinn initial platform proposals

September 12, 2017

                “What are you offering me?”

                It is a phrase occasionally heard on the campaign trail, albeit sometimes articulated in a less blunt fashion. Still, while it is direct, it is an important question to be answered ...