An Existential Crisis Revisited

Seeking a peaceful calm in the autumn of my years, I am struck by how tumultuous a time we live in. It is as if our nation’s soul is in the midst of an existential crisis without any guarantee whether we will find ourselves with an enhanced or degraded sense of humanity. More than at any time in my recent memory, I harbor deep concerns about the future of our republic. As unique and alarming as this feeling is for me, we have been here before.

In the presidential election of 1860, our country was at a crossroads as the question of slavery became a test for our nation’s soul. Three years earlier, a magazine named The Atlantic was created largely to support the abolition of slavery. It was, therefore, not surprising when that publication endorsed Abraham Lincoln in one of the most significant elections of our republic. The founder, James Russell Lowell, argued that the Republican Party as embodied by Lincoln represented the only plausible path to saving the soul of this great nation. He wrote passionately, “It is in a moral aversion to slavery as a great wrong that the chief strength of the Republican Party lies.”

It would be 104 years before this publication would again make a presidential endorsement. In 1964, echoing the spirit of Lowell’s words, editor Edward Weeks noted in the magazine’s endorsement of President Lyndon Baines Johnson that his election would provide “to the vexed problem of civil rights a power of conciliation which will prevent us from stumbling down the road taken by South Africa.” More striking than The Atlantic’s embrace of President Johnson was its acknowledged aversion to his opponent, Arizona Sen. Barry Goldwater. Mr. Weeks made it clear that the election of Goldwater would do extreme damage to the cause of civil rights, especially in light of the fact that Goldwater’s “preference to let states like Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia enforce civil rights within their own borders had attracted the allegiance of Gov. George Wallace, the Ku Klux Klan and the John Birch Society.” It must be noted that many members of the Party of Lincoln followed the lead of The Atlantic and rejected the candidacy of Sen. Goldwater.

Sign Up for E-News

For the next 52 years, The Atlantic carried on its tradition of making no political endorsements until this year. After citing Hillary Clinton’s flaws (“some legitimately troubling, some exaggerated by her opponents”), the magazine goes on to observe “she is among the most prepared candidates to ever seek the presidency. We are confident that she understands the role of the United States in the world; we have no doubt that she will apply herself assiduously to the problems confronting this country; and she has demonstrated an aptitude for analysis and hard work.”

Reminiscent of their 1964 endorsement, they mixed praise of Mrs. Clinton with alarm at the prospect of a Trump presidency: “Donald Trump, on the other hand, has no record of public service and no qualifications for public office. His affect is that of an infomercial huckster; he traffics in conspiracy theories and racial invective; he expresses admiration for authoritarian rulers, and evinces authoritarian tendencies himself. He is easily goaded, a poor quality for someone seeking control of America’s nuclear arsenal.”

Significantly, The Atlantic makes it a point to acknowledge the authenticity of many of the Trump supporter’s concerns; “many…are motivated by legitimate anxieties about their future and their place in the American economy. But Trump has seized on these anxieties and inflamed them and racialized them, without proposing realistic policies to address them.”

The Atlantic was not the only publication to do the unexpected this year. The Arizona Republic (founded in 1890) had never endorsed a Democrat for president but did so this month. Like The Atlantic, the paper candidly acknowledges Mrs. Clinton’s shortcomings but prefers her steady hand to Mr. Trump’s petulance. Representing the paper, editorial page editor Phil Boas made no bones about his objections to Mr. Trump: “Trump’s long history of objectifying and his demeaning comments about women during the campaign are not just good old boy gaffes…they are evidence of deep character flaws. They are part of a pattern.” Mr. Boas reassures his readers that the editorial board decision was consistent with their conservative values: “Trump through the primaries and into the general election did a half-dozen things that we believe would have been disqualifiers in years past. We think that we are being traditionalists here. We’re saying we’re not willing to compromise our values.”

Similarly, the Dallas Morning News, which had not endorsed a Democrat since before World War II, endorsed Hillary Clinton this year. The Cincinnati Enquirer which had an almost 100-year tradition of supporting Republican presidential candidates (including Sen. Goldwater) was so outraged by the antics of Mr. Trump that they backed Mrs. Clinton, as did the conservative-leaning Houston Chronicle.

This year’s presidential election presents us with a choice that supersedes the standard Democrat vs. Republican contest. The Republican Party has a long and proud history of putting forward quality candidates, but not this year. Like no election in my lifetime, this November we must make a momentous decision that will have far-reaching ramifications for our history. The Atlantic put it quite clearly: “If Hillary Clinton were facing Mitt Romney, or John McCain, or George W. Bush or, for that matter, any of the leading candidates Trump vanquished in the Republican primaries, we would not have contemplated making this endorsement.”

But Hillary Clinton is not facing any of the above named candidates; she is facing Donald Trump. Eloquently expressing the anguish that so many of us feel, The Atlantic ended its endorsement with the following observation: “We believe in American democracy, in which individuals from various parties of different ideological stripes can advance their ideas and compete for the affection of voters. But Trump is not a man of ideas. He is a demagogue, a xenophobe, a sexist, a know-nothing and a liar. He is spectacularly unfit for office, and voters—the statesman and the thinkers of the ballot box—should act in defense of American democracy and elect his opponent.”

The opinions expressed herein are the writer's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of TAPinto.net or anyone who works for TAPinto.net. TAPinto.net is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the writer.

TAP Into Another Town's News:

You May Also Be Interested In

Sign Up for E-News

Yorktown

What Is Cambridge Analytica?

Cambridge Analytica is a research organization. Apparently, it is funded by the Mercer family, second only to the Koch brothers on the liberal hit list. Both, through their philanthropy, spend millions on various needy organizations like hospitals. What makes them liberal targets is their funding of various conservative think tanks and candidates. I digress.

Cambridge Analytica used Facebook ...

The Best of the Best: Albert Capellini

In the spring of 1991, after answering an ad for a judicial race placed in the local Yorktown paper, I was talked into the unenviable position of running for Yorktown councilman as a Democrat in our then solidly Republican town.

Having been a practicing lawyer since 1974, I felt confident about my qualifications for the position of town judge, but being elected to the Town Board was quite ...

‘Sister Act’: A Musical Like Nun Other

Of all the Broadway musicals I’ve seen over the years at Westchester Broadway Theatre, only a handful have elicited the noisily enthusiastic audience response I observed at the recent opening night of “Sister Act.”

There were outbursts of applause in the middle of some numbers, and several clever turns of phrase sprinkled in the dialogue landed squarely, to the delight of big ...

An Open Letter to the Yorktown Town Board

April 11, 2018

The Yorktown Chamber of Commerce proudly serves as the voice of Yorktown’s vibrant business community. A vital part of our mission is to help improve the quality of life for all Yorktowners.

The chamber’s Board of Directors is more ambitious than ever, as we work hard to find new ways to enhance our great community through marketing opportunities and smartly placed commercial and ...

Cleaning the Empty Nest

Part of the shock of being a part-time empty nester is when the kids come back to visit and I have to watch my house transform overnight from a pristine haven of OCD goodness to a place that looks like an explosion happened at Forever 21.

After my kids moved mostly out, I put away whatever tchotchkes they chose to leave behind and then I put on a hazmat suit and cleaned their rooms until they ...

Why Do Kids Hate Math?

Dear Dr. Linda,

I am in second grade and have a problem about math. My teacher just keeps giving me homework and it’s driving me crazy. Because she keeps giving it to me on weekends and spring and summer breaks. And it’s only one level and it’s too hard. But the other people who have special needs get to be moved into a higher or lower group and they learn even more because ...

Upcoming Events

Sun, April 22

DoubleTree by Hilton, Tarrytown

Awaken Wellness Fair

Health & Wellness

Sun, April 22, 9:00 AM

Yorktown Sports Complex, Yorktown Heights

Yorkville Sports Association (YSA) Draft Day

Giving Back Sports

Sun, April 22, 10:00 AM

Yorktown Sports Complex, Yorktown Heights

Yorkville Sports Association Preseason 50+ - 60+ ...

Giving Back Sports

Guiding Eyes for the Blind Launches Wag-a-Thon Fundraiser

April 18, 2018

On April 17, Guiding Eyes for the Blind, a non-profit organization dedicated to creating and supporting life-changing connections between people with vision loss and exceptional guide dogs, announced its first annual Wag-a-thon, a “virtual marathon in a month” fundraiser beginning on May 1.

The Wag-a-thon is a cumulative marathon that you and your dog can do anywhere, at your own ...