The Future Is in Your Hands

The 1970s were a tumultuous and soul-searching period in our nation’s history. The movement, which had begun in the ‘60s, to extend the rights of previously marginalized groups—women, African-Americans, gays and lesbians—was in full swing, as were the protests against the ongoing war in Vietnam, which by then had extended into Cambodia.

Defending the “old order” was a vigorous “new right,” which sought to defend political conservatism and what they called “traditional family values.” Concurrently, millions of Americans began to lose faith in their government in the wake of the behavior and resignation of President Richard Nixon. With these monumental forces at work, the future direction of our country—politically, socially, and technologically—was very much in doubt.

Back then, as it is today, America was in need of a voice that would make some reassuring sense of what was happening all around us. To our collective rescue came a little known social scientist named Alvin Toffler. Toffler was a scholar and freelance writer who had dedicated five years of his life studying the causes of social upheaval, which he clearly saw engulfing not only the United States but also the world. His groundbreaking first work, “Future Shock,” was a mesmerizing study of how the union of science, capital and communication was producing change so rapidly that an entirely new society was destined to emerge. These themes were repeated in two later works: “The Third Wave” and “Powershift.” Although he published 13 books in all, the three listed herein are his famous “trilogy.”

Sign Up for E-News

Alvin Toffler passed away last week at the age of 87. Forty-six years ago, I read his book in one sitting. In preparation for this column, I went back and reread “Future Shock” and was amazed at how applicable his words are today.

His message was unmistakable: we were in for a rough ride. This “new society” was not necessarily going to be an improvement over the old one. The “roaring current of change” was producing, he believed, measurable negative effects in individuals and in their relationship with their families and their communities.

On a scientific level, he correctly foresaw cloning, personal computers, the internet, cable television and telecommuting. He considered himself a “futurist” and described his role succinctly in his main work’s preface: “we who explore the future are like those ancient mapmakers, and it is in this spirit that the concept of future shock and the theory of the adaptive range are presented here-not as a final word, but as a first approximation of the new realities, filled with danger and promise, created by the accelerative thrust.”

Tofler’s proviso that “no serious futurist deals in predictions…these are left for television oracles and newspaper astrologers” is in direct conflict with my favorite “futurist,” Michio Kaku. After interviewing over 300 scientists, this brilliant scientist did not hold back in making countless futuristic predictions in one of my favorite books: “Physics of the Future.” In this scientific masterpiece, Kaku describes our society in the year 2100. For Kaku, the future is bright and exciting: “we will control computers via tiny brain sensors and, like magicians, move objects around with the power of our minds. Artificial intelligence will be dispersed throughout the environment, and internet enabled contact lenses will allow us to access the world’s information base or conjure up any image we desire in the blink of an eye.”

In spite of Dr. Kaku’s optimism, history teaches us that the development of technological advances is never a given nor a straight line. The free market and political forces often play a crucial role in either advancing or stymieing the march of science. I remember being at the AT&T pavilion at the 1964 World’s Fair in New York City. On display was what was called the “television phone,” which would display on a TV screen the person to whom you were talking. Only 100 were ever made (at a cost of $1 million each) and, aside from its presence on a few television shows, they disappeared altogether until the relatively recent emergence of “Facetime.”

The resistance of politicians to acknowledge and intelligently act on the irrefutable scientific evidence of global warming is another example of how a better future is no sure thing. Recently, the Union of Concerned Scientists issued this stern warning: “Global warming is already having significant and harmful effects on our communities, our health and our climate. Sea level rise is accelerating. The number of large wildfires is growing. Dangerous heat waves are becoming more common. Extreme storm events are increasing in many areas. More severe droughts are occurring in others. We must take immediate action to address global warming or these consequences will continue to intensify, grow ever more costly, and increasingly affect the entire planet—including you, your community and your family.” Yet a majority of our leaders in the House of Representatives indicated their opposition to the concept of global warning.

So, where do we go from here? Writer Farhad Manjoo suggests we need to “pick up Alvin Toffler’s torch.” He believes that Toffler had it right, but he also laments our present lack of futuristic vision: “It’s almost as if we have collectively stopped planning for the future. Instead, we all just sort of bounce along in the present, caught in the headlights of a tomorrow…It’s not just future shock; we now have future blindness.” Toffler himself provides a warning that we would be wise to heed: “The illiterate of the future will not be the person who cannot read. It will be the person who does not know how to learn.”

Perhaps the words of Michio Kaku sum it up best: “There are two competing trends in the world today: one is to create a planetary civilization that is tolerant, scientific, and prosperous, but the other glorifies anarchy and ignorance that could rip the fabric of our society.” More optimistic than Toffler, Kaku suggests that “in the future, we will make the transition from being passive observers of the dance of nature, to being the choreographers of nature.” Dr. Kaku’s refrain calls for the wielding of the “sword of science with wisdom and equanimity, taming the barbarism of our ancient past.”

In spite of their differences, Toffler and Kaku agree on two important matters: 1) change is both inevitable and irresistible, and (2) the type of society that will emerge—inclusive or exclusive, just or unjust, intelligent or ignorant—is up to us.

Vote wisely, my friends.

The opinions expressed herein are the writer's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of TAPinto.net or anyone who works for TAPinto.net. TAPinto.net is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the writer.

TAP Into Another Town's News:

You May Also Be Interested In

Sign Up for E-News

Yorktown

God Is Just! Schneiderman Is Out!

Whenever you doubt that God is just, remember last Monday. That is the day New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman resigned.

As you know, I have had him in my sights for a long time. He has squandered our tax dollars with more than 100 lawsuits against the Trump administration. Plus, his lawsuits against Big Oil and trying to nullify our double jeopardy laws. Most will go nowhere as ...

A Scientific Look at Decision-Making

Seven years ago, when I first began sharing my thoughts with you, I posed the question: What are the neurological mechanics of decision-making? I was referring not only to decisions about our actions, but also to the method by which we form our beliefs and preferences, political and otherwise. What inspired that inquiry, at that time, was my observation that our nation was increasingly polarized ...

Bias in Media, in Me, in You

While listening to an interview with a voter on my car radio, I thought I had excess ear wax that obstructed my hearing. The voter (whose name is Bruce) said this about one of the qualifications that a Senate or House candidate must have to earn his vote: “I don’t want anyone with ideas. We have enough of those already.”

I’m a journalist and have been one my entire ...

Cross My Legs and Hope to Die

One morning, I had a big cup of coffee as I usually do, and then I got in the car and drove 40 minutes to a clothing store I had been curious to check out. I don’t normally drive 40 minutes to go shopping, but since I am a stay-at-home mom and everyone knows we stay-at-home moms just spend our time shopping and eating bonbons, I figured, “What the hey.”

Having had the ...

Don’t Mix Politics with Business

May 17, 2018

When every year is an election year, it’s hard to avoid “talking” politics—but business leaders need to try.

The problem is that talking politics changes relationships. You quickly go from business owner or salesperson to Democrat, Republican, etc.

Putting a political sign in front of your business is a clear sign (literally) of your views. Not only do you tell your ...

Upcoming Events

Wed, May 23, 8:00 AM

Mercy College, Yorktown Heights

Business Enterprise and Employment Opportunity ...

Business & Finance

Fri, May 25, 10:30 AM

Yorktown Community Cultural Center, YORKTOWN HEIGHTS

Tai Chi for Women with Cancer

Health & Wellness

Sat, May 26, 12:00 PM

Club Fit, Jefferson Valley

Yoga for Women with Cancer

Health & Wellness

Yorktown Youth Soccer Club Roundup

May 18, 2018

YORKTOWN, N.Y. – Yorktown’s Girls U9 Team, the Hurricanes, defeated the Poughkeepsie Fireflies with a 1-0 win at Hunterbrook Field in Yorktown.

Hurricane’s goalies Cameron Parise and Avery Pugliese shut out the Poughkeepsie offense with several key saves. Yorktown controlled the ball throughout the game with outstanding performances by midfielders Samantha Nastasi, Macey ...