My Perspective

Challenging the Norm

In his thoughtful work, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” Thomas Kuhn reflects on the revolutionary contributions of such giants as Copernicus, Newton, Darwin and Einstein. But he is quick to remind us that it’s often the scientists whose names we never hear of who make the vast majority of scientific progress. These hardworking men and women spend most of their waking hours doing “normal science” and their results are the heart and soul of our technological advancement.

Kuhn points out that science, like every intellectual endeavor, operates within a paradigm. A paradigm is an established system that is its own world. It tells the scientist what questions to ask, what tools to use, and what constitutes reasonable answers. The way it works is as follows: Someone poses a question that the paradigm deems valid, “accepted” methods are employed, and answers are achieved that are judged by the parameters set by the paradigm itself. So, as you can see, the entire system is self-verifying. This kind of intellectual trap reminds me of the logician’s dilemma when trying to prove the veracity of inductive reasoning by reasoning inductively.

An established paradigm can be both good and bad. It can provide a useful function by serving as a compass, directing us in our efforts as we strive to make new advancements. It can, however, set limits on our inquiries in that it is a self-contained system intolerant to deviations.

Sign Up for E-News

Occasionally, during our scientific explorations, an answer is achieved that doesn’t make sense given the set of norms that have been accepted by the scientific community. This is often excused as an anomaly. When these “anomalies” become too frequent, horror of horrors, the scientists are forced, reluctantly, to re-evaluate the paradigm itself. This type of intellectual revolution shakes the scientific community to its core and has only happened a handful of times. Copernicus, Newton, Darwin, Freud, Einstein and others were leaders in such revolutions as they challenged the prevailing wisdom of the times. Old ideas do not die easily and each of these brilliant intellectuals experienced heated resistance. Eventually, their theories supplanted, at least for a time, the ideas that had preceded them to become the prevailing paradigm.

Challenges to the mainstream way of thinking are not limited to the scientific arena. All fields of human endeavor have been witness to bold innovators who are more than willing to push, and sometimes shatter, accepted concepts of their time. One such pioneer in the field of literature is author Tom Wolfe.

Tom Wolfe is one of the most extraordinary and interesting writers ever to put pen to paper. William F. Buckley Jr. called him “the most skillful writer in America—I mean that he can do more things with words than anyone else.” The creator of “New Journalism,” Wolfe’s style challenged the status quo by writing nonfiction in a new and compelling way, or, as he put it, “I could combine two loves: reporting and the sociological concepts American studies had introduced to me, especially status theory as first developed by the German sociologist Max Weber.”

His style is like no other. I was hooked the minute I picked up his 1968 work, “The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test.” The book is an account of his travels throughout California with Ken Kesey and his “Merry Pranksters” as they spread the gospel of L.S.D. It wasn’t so much the subject matter but his masterful way of engaging the reader that was so striking. It compelled me to read all his other works.

In 1971, I had the honor of spending a weekend at the Toronto home of Marshall McLuhan, author, philosopher, professor and the first real media expert. McLuhan was in his heyday back then, but I had met him the year before, when he was a professor at Fordham. I was completely mesmerized by his groundbreaking ideas: McLuhan didn’t just deviate from the accepted thinking of his day, he shattered it. When I arrived at his stately home, I was informed that Tom Wolfe had just left. Wolfe had generously left behind, as a present to the McLuhan family, a weird box-like contraption that emitted light and sound at various intervals. As excited as I was to spend time discussing McLuhan’s rather startling ideas with none other than the professor himself, I couldn’t help but regret that I had just missed talking to one of the greatest literary minds of our time.

In the early 1980s, my disappointment turned to joy. Making my daily sojourn up the escalator of the old criminal courthouse in the Bronx, I spotted a finely dressed stately man, clothed in a white double-breasted silk suit, white vest, tie, and old-fashioned pleated pants. He was taking furious notes as he talked to anyone he could corner. Tom Wolfe was in my courthouse doing research for his next book, a novel. I finally did get to talk to him that day. His focus was to garner information about the various “characters” in our court system and he took notes as adroitly as any court reporter I’d ever seen.

Not long after our encounter, Wolfe published “The Bonfire of the Vanities,” a novel that offered what the New York Times called “a sweeping, bitingly satirical picture of money, power, greed and vanity in New York during the shameless excesses of the 1980s.” His work was so fascinating that Mr. Dobell, an editor at Esquire, described the author this way: “He has this unique gift of language that sets him apart as Tom Wolfe. It is full of hyperbole; it is brilliant; it is funny, and he has a wonderful ear for how people look and feel. He has a gift of fluency that pours out of him the way Balzac had it.”

As a society, we are truly indebted to all those among us who, in whatever field they toil, are willing to challenge the conventional way of thinking in the pursuit of excellence. Tom Wolfe, who passed away last week, was one such innovator. His ability to transform the way we look at nonfiction lives on in his many amazing contributions. For that, I salute and thank you, Mr. Wolfe. You will be missed.

The opinions expressed herein are the writer's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of or anyone who works for is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the writer.

TAP Into Another Town's News:

You May Also Be Interested In

Sign Up for E-News


I Do Not Make Stuff Up!

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote in my column, “Watergate analogies apply to Obama, not Trump,” that President Obama’s Justice Department planted a spy in the Trump campaign. I said I used the term “spy” because this was a counter-intelligence operation, not a criminal investigation, where the term informant would have been proper.

That statement has been brought ...

Interview with Senate Candidate, Robert Kesten

The seat in the 40th Senate District of New York, currently occupied by Republican Sen. Terrence Murphy, is up this year. Senator Murphy, who has announced he is seeking re-election, has already started campaigning. On the Democratic side, newcomer Robert Kesten entered the race. Challenging him for the Democratic nomination is former county Legislator Peter Harckham. Kesten and Harckham will ...

What Kind of Sports Parent Are You?

Social media recently showered a lot of likes and love on a high school pitcher in Minnesota whose team was playing in a regional final that would send the winning team to the state championship game.

After the last batter of the game struck out, the pitcher did something unheard of. Rather than spontaneously join his teammates in an on-field celebration, as is customary, the pitcher ...

Packing Heat

“Are you leaving me?” asked my husband one night as he surveyed the contents of my closet on our bed.

“What? No!” I said. “Why would you think that?”

“Every single article of clothing you own is laid out on our bed,” he replied. “So I have to assume you are either leaving me or you have joined the armed services and if that’s the ...

What More Can Murphy Do?

June 21, 2018

In his letter “Murphy should address gun laws” (June 14), Bernard Lipsy praises Sen. Terrence Murphy and then condemns him for not keeping guns away from people that shouldn’t have them. I was wondering just what new laws he would propose? How many more laws are needed? How about enforcing the numerous laws already on the books, which, by the way, isn’t being done?

What ...

Upcoming Events


Sun, June 24, 1:00 PM

Yorktown Heights

Bocce Open Play


Thu, June 28, 12:30 PM

Frankie and Augie'Z, Jefferson Valley

IBM Retirees Club

Community Calendar


Thu, June 28, 1:00 PM

Yorktown Heights

Bocce Open Play


Yorktown Youth Soccer Club Results

June 15, 2018

Sunday, June 10  - The Yorktown Crew clinched the Westchester Youth Soccer League JV-1 Division with a 4-3 win over Rivertown FC on Sunday. The team has been on a remarkable run for the past 2 seasons with a team record of 16-1-1. Sunday’s matchup vs Rivertown had a championship like atmosphere as Rivertown trailed Yorktown by 1 point in the standings. The Crew worked hard all week in ...